Does being smart and innovative require that AIs can never truly, deeply conform to social rules? [In development still]

Most believe AIs must not fully conform to social rules to be smart and innovative.

The market shows a significant inclination towards the belief that true intelligence and innovation in AIs necessitate a degree of non-conformity to social rules, with a probability of 65.02% for 'YES'. However, the edge of -5 indicates insufficient data for a confident assessment, and the confidence level is moderate at 50/100.

• 1 Current sentiment favors non-conformity in AIs for innovation.
• 2 Market probability shows a clear preference for 'YES' at 65.02%.
• 3 Pulse AI probability aligns closely but slightly lower at 60.02%.
• 4 The edge of -5 suggests data limitations impact confidence.
• 5 Time to expiry is substantial at 6725 hours, allowing for potential shifts.